<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Where&#8217;s Apple&#8217;s killer image app?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://watchingapple.com/2007/11/wheres-apples-killer-image-app/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://watchingapple.com/2007/11/wheres-apples-killer-image-app/</link>
	<description>Thoughts about Apple and design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 02:32:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Egill</title>
		<link>http://watchingapple.com/2007/11/wheres-apples-killer-image-app/comment-page-1/#comment-6108</link>
		<dc:creator>Egill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 18:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchingapple.com/2007/11/wheres-apples-killer-image-app/#comment-6108</guid>
		<description>Totally agree!

But just wondering, from whom did Apple buy their cool apps, like Sebhelyesfarku and KIMP said?

Nice site by the way...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree!</p>
<p>But just wondering, from whom did Apple buy their cool apps, like Sebhelyesfarku and KIMP said?</p>
<p>Nice site by the way&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KIMP</title>
		<link>http://watchingapple.com/2007/11/wheres-apples-killer-image-app/comment-page-1/#comment-1564</link>
		<dc:creator>KIMP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 19:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchingapple.com/2007/11/wheres-apples-killer-image-app/#comment-1564</guid>
		<description>Great site! Just discovered it...

For years I&#039;ve been saying this to fellow worker. I&#039;ve been working in the graphic design industry since 1996. Seriously, with the technology and especially the way Adobe &quot;behave&quot; with their Apple products... Apple should simply do it.

Yeah Apple did buy almost ALL of their killer apps; iTunes, Coverflow, Logic, Motion, Final Cut etc. But buying Adobe is another thing. Apple has $15.4 billion in cash the company has accumulated—$5 billion in the past year (according to Fortune). Abode is worth $25 billion so...

But as the past as shown, Apple would probably buy a smaller software/company that has a bright future.

One image processing software that really impressed is Pixelmator. Its still in its infancy but its use of the Core features of the Mac OSX is very surprising. Sure it needs to mature a lot and add some very important and professional features, but thats actually something the Apple guys could deliver!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great site! Just discovered it&#8230;</p>
<p>For years I&#8217;ve been saying this to fellow worker. I&#8217;ve been working in the graphic design industry since 1996. Seriously, with the technology and especially the way Adobe &#8220;behave&#8221; with their Apple products&#8230; Apple should simply do it.</p>
<p>Yeah Apple did buy almost ALL of their killer apps; iTunes, Coverflow, Logic, Motion, Final Cut etc. But buying Adobe is another thing. Apple has $15.4 billion in cash the company has accumulated—$5 billion in the past year (according to Fortune). Abode is worth $25 billion so&#8230;</p>
<p>But as the past as shown, Apple would probably buy a smaller software/company that has a bright future.</p>
<p>One image processing software that really impressed is Pixelmator. Its still in its infancy but its use of the Core features of the Mac OSX is very surprising. Sure it needs to mature a lot and add some very important and professional features, but thats actually something the Apple guys could deliver!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PECourtejoie</title>
		<link>http://watchingapple.com/2007/11/wheres-apples-killer-image-app/comment-page-1/#comment-1351</link>
		<dc:creator>PECourtejoie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 19:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchingapple.com/2007/11/wheres-apples-killer-image-app/#comment-1351</guid>
		<description>Photoshop engineers first jumped to OS X, had to recode everything, used to code in codewarrior, rewrite everything to work with Xcode, that was not very mature at the time, and now will need to recode everything in Cocoa... If that is not commitment to a platform, I wonder what would it be.

James, it seems that you do not use Aperture, nor a camera that can produce raw files... Compare that to the Lightroom/Camera Raw updates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Photoshop engineers first jumped to OS X, had to recode everything, used to code in codewarrior, rewrite everything to work with Xcode, that was not very mature at the time, and now will need to recode everything in Cocoa&#8230; If that is not commitment to a platform, I wonder what would it be.</p>
<p>James, it seems that you do not use Aperture, nor a camera that can produce raw files&#8230; Compare that to the Lightroom/Camera Raw updates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Katt</title>
		<link>http://watchingapple.com/2007/11/wheres-apples-killer-image-app/comment-page-1/#comment-935</link>
		<dc:creator>James Katt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 09:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchingapple.com/2007/11/wheres-apples-killer-image-app/#comment-935</guid>
		<description>Apple can easily buy Adobe.
Apple can then ditch the Windows versions and keep the Mac versions.
Then Photoshop will update much more quickly with a Mac centric version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple can easily buy Adobe.<br />
Apple can then ditch the Windows versions and keep the Mac versions.<br />
Then Photoshop will update much more quickly with a Mac centric version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebhelyesfarku</title>
		<link>http://watchingapple.com/2007/11/wheres-apples-killer-image-app/comment-page-1/#comment-934</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebhelyesfarku</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 09:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchingapple.com/2007/11/wheres-apples-killer-image-app/#comment-934</guid>
		<description>Btw, Apple bought its &quot;killer&quot; apps, like iTunes, Coverflow, Logic, Motion, Final Cut etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Btw, Apple bought its &#8220;killer&#8221; apps, like iTunes, Coverflow, Logic, Motion, Final Cut etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake A. Smith</title>
		<link>http://watchingapple.com/2007/11/wheres-apples-killer-image-app/comment-page-1/#comment-926</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake A. Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 22:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchingapple.com/2007/11/wheres-apples-killer-image-app/#comment-926</guid>
		<description>Leo, who said anything about a photo app? Sure, photoshop is great for photos, but it&#039;s used for so much more! I think Apple could pull off an amazing imaging app, but i think such an app is at least a year or two off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leo, who said anything about a photo app? Sure, photoshop is great for photos, but it&#8217;s used for so much more! I think Apple could pull off an amazing imaging app, but i think such an app is at least a year or two off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leo</title>
		<link>http://watchingapple.com/2007/11/wheres-apples-killer-image-app/comment-page-1/#comment-921</link>
		<dc:creator>Leo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 20:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchingapple.com/2007/11/wheres-apples-killer-image-app/#comment-921</guid>
		<description>Yet ANOTHER photo application. That&#039;s original.

Oh, I have another, what about another text editor? You know, we don&#039;t have enough of those either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet ANOTHER photo application. That&#8217;s original.</p>
<p>Oh, I have another, what about another text editor? You know, we don&#8217;t have enough of those either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Barta</title>
		<link>http://watchingapple.com/2007/11/wheres-apples-killer-image-app/comment-page-1/#comment-918</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Barta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 18:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchingapple.com/2007/11/wheres-apples-killer-image-app/#comment-918</guid>
		<description>I agree 100%; I&#039;ve been making this argument for years. It always irritated me 1) how much effect Adobe&#039;s lackadaisical efforts had on Apple 2) How much they kow-tow to the Windows crowd, who shouldn&#039;t be trying to do serious  image work in Windows to begin with.

Apple should write a Reader/Distiller killer, too. Preview is already better than half-way there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree 100%; I&#8217;ve been making this argument for years. It always irritated me 1) how much effect Adobe&#8217;s lackadaisical efforts had on Apple 2) How much they kow-tow to the Windows crowd, who shouldn&#8217;t be trying to do serious  image work in Windows to begin with.</p>
<p>Apple should write a Reader/Distiller killer, too. Preview is already better than half-way there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

