<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to botch a demo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://watchingapple.com/2008/05/how-to-botch-a-demo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://watchingapple.com/2008/05/how-to-botch-a-demo/</link>
	<description>Thoughts about Apple and design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 02:32:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Blackburn</title>
		<link>http://watchingapple.com/2008/05/how-to-botch-a-demo/comment-page-1/#comment-7344</link>
		<dc:creator>John Blackburn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchingapple.com/?p=384#comment-7344</guid>
		<description>bob, I appreciate your comment. My critique was about the quality of the demo and its effectiveness – not about the technology.  I also use all of the technologies you mention and appreciate their shortcomings and advantages, but unless you regard any critique of anything Microsoft-related as evidence of fanaticism, your comment seems groundless with regards to this post.  As it is, it seems you&#039;ve confused criticism with elitism, and a mention of décolletage with sexism.  I intended neither.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bob, I appreciate your comment. My critique was about the quality of the demo and its effectiveness – not about the technology.  I also use all of the technologies you mention and appreciate their shortcomings and advantages, but unless you regard any critique of anything Microsoft-related as evidence of fanaticism, your comment seems groundless with regards to this post.  As it is, it seems you&#8217;ve confused criticism with elitism, and a mention of décolletage with sexism.  I intended neither.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob</title>
		<link>http://watchingapple.com/2008/05/how-to-botch-a-demo/comment-page-1/#comment-7342</link>
		<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 15:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchingapple.com/?p=384#comment-7342</guid>
		<description>What a stupid critique - but what would you expect from an Apple fanatic? You give Mac users a bad name! 

Being sexist and snobbish is a strange attitude for someone who purports to be far superior than the rest of us mere mortals... yet finds the demo explanations &#039;too technical&#039;. I find that hilarious as she explained all of the concepts very simply and clearly. .. 

Look, I use MAcs, iPhone, Windows, Linux and Solaris.. they all get the job done and they ALL (including Mac) have their shortcomings. Can we get off this PETTY biased OS evangelism - and replace it with some logic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a stupid critique &#8211; but what would you expect from an Apple fanatic? You give Mac users a bad name! </p>
<p>Being sexist and snobbish is a strange attitude for someone who purports to be far superior than the rest of us mere mortals&#8230; yet finds the demo explanations &#8216;too technical&#8217;. I find that hilarious as she explained all of the concepts very simply and clearly. .. </p>
<p>Look, I use MAcs, iPhone, Windows, Linux and Solaris.. they all get the job done and they ALL (including Mac) have their shortcomings. Can we get off this PETTY biased OS evangelism &#8211; and replace it with some logic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Partners in Grime</title>
		<link>http://watchingapple.com/2008/05/how-to-botch-a-demo/comment-page-1/#comment-6539</link>
		<dc:creator>Partners in Grime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 00:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchingapple.com/?p=384#comment-6539</guid>
		<description>Performed with the sleight of décolletage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Performed with the sleight of décolletage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://watchingapple.com/2008/05/how-to-botch-a-demo/comment-page-1/#comment-6523</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 00:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchingapple.com/?p=384#comment-6523</guid>
		<description>The demo wasn&#039;t quite that bad, nor was it very good. She did point out that touch would be used when appropriate as a complement to the keyboard and mouse. It does seem that they have an interesting technology in search of a problem. On an iPhone touch is huge because it is a mobile device and you just use your fingers for driving it and the screen is relatively small. On a desktop or laptop there is less use for touch. There is not much difference in clicking on an object from touching it. The photo manipulation looks fun but doesn&#039;t seem practical. You can already do that well with a mouse and keyboard. We&#039;ll see. Once we all have this it may seem very natural. It was interesting that someone commented how the screen was becoming dirty after only a few minutes of use. Imagine people walking past your desk and dragging their fingers across your screen after eating donuts. I also wonder about inadvertent clicks. People like to poke at the screen just to point at something, not to invoke an action.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The demo wasn&#8217;t quite that bad, nor was it very good. She did point out that touch would be used when appropriate as a complement to the keyboard and mouse. It does seem that they have an interesting technology in search of a problem. On an iPhone touch is huge because it is a mobile device and you just use your fingers for driving it and the screen is relatively small. On a desktop or laptop there is less use for touch. There is not much difference in clicking on an object from touching it. The photo manipulation looks fun but doesn&#8217;t seem practical. You can already do that well with a mouse and keyboard. We&#8217;ll see. Once we all have this it may seem very natural. It was interesting that someone commented how the screen was becoming dirty after only a few minutes of use. Imagine people walking past your desk and dragging their fingers across your screen after eating donuts. I also wonder about inadvertent clicks. People like to poke at the screen just to point at something, not to invoke an action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blad_Rnr</title>
		<link>http://watchingapple.com/2008/05/how-to-botch-a-demo/comment-page-1/#comment-6520</link>
		<dc:creator>Blad_Rnr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 19:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchingapple.com/?p=384#comment-6520</guid>
		<description>After years now of watching Steve Jobs, MSFT still doesn&#039;t understand the art of presentation (of course, neither do 95% of the rest of the world&#039;s CEOs). This is an art, and if you don&#039;t learn it, it looks silly and stupid and you don&#039;t get your message across. I guess the maker&#039;s of Powerpoint can&#039;t seem to find any other way to demo something than what they have done for the last 25 years.

You really nailed this: where are the solutions? The iPhone is great because it is a solution. People who use it understand what it does BETTER than other smart phones. I can do the same things that this demo did with a mouse. They never said, &quot;this will solve problem y.&quot; All I saw was a gimmicky way of maneuvering items on a screen. That will last about ten minutes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After years now of watching Steve Jobs, MSFT still doesn&#8217;t understand the art of presentation (of course, neither do 95% of the rest of the world&#8217;s CEOs). This is an art, and if you don&#8217;t learn it, it looks silly and stupid and you don&#8217;t get your message across. I guess the maker&#8217;s of Powerpoint can&#8217;t seem to find any other way to demo something than what they have done for the last 25 years.</p>
<p>You really nailed this: where are the solutions? The iPhone is great because it is a solution. People who use it understand what it does BETTER than other smart phones. I can do the same things that this demo did with a mouse. They never said, &#8220;this will solve problem y.&#8221; All I saw was a gimmicky way of maneuvering items on a screen. That will last about ten minutes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: george</title>
		<link>http://watchingapple.com/2008/05/how-to-botch-a-demo/comment-page-1/#comment-6519</link>
		<dc:creator>george</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 18:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchingapple.com/?p=384#comment-6519</guid>
		<description>Nice n&#039; sarcastic, just they way I like it when it comes to MS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice n&#8217; sarcastic, just they way I like it when it comes to MS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

