<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pixar&#8217;s blistering rendering speed for Toy Story 3D</title>
	<atom:link href="http://watchingapple.com/2009/09/pixars-blistering-rendering-speed-for-toy-story-3d/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://watchingapple.com/2009/09/pixars-blistering-rendering-speed-for-toy-story-3d/</link>
	<description>Thoughts about Apple and design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 23:14:47 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Toy Story 3: Full trailer released / Antikewl Daily / A regular source of entertainment &#38; inspiration</title>
		<link>http://watchingapple.com/2009/09/pixars-blistering-rendering-speed-for-toy-story-3d/comment-page-1/#comment-45889</link>
		<dc:creator>Toy Story 3: Full trailer released / Antikewl Daily / A regular source of entertainment &#38; inspiration</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 13:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchingapple.com/?p=1066#comment-45889</guid>
		<description>[...] has progressed over the past 14 years&#8230; For the re-release the original Toy Story was rendered 86,400 times more quickly than it could have been done in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has progressed over the past 14 years&#8230; For the re-release the original Toy Story was rendered 86,400 times more quickly than it could have been done in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SDG</title>
		<link>http://watchingapple.com/2009/09/pixars-blistering-rendering-speed-for-toy-story-3d/comment-page-1/#comment-45193</link>
		<dc:creator>SDG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 16:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchingapple.com/?p=1066#comment-45193</guid>
		<description>&quot;More than 86400 times faster than 14 years ago.&quot;

Is that all?? :-) 

Since the new version is in 3-D, each frame actually involves two separate renderings of the scene. So wouldn&#039;t it be 172,800 times faster?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;More than 86400 times faster than 14 years ago.&#8221;</p>
<p>Is that all?? <img src='http://watchingapple.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Since the new version is in 3-D, each frame actually involves two separate renderings of the scene. So wouldn&#8217;t it be 172,800 times faster?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
